Would You Vote to Kill Steph Curry, Justin Bieber and Steve Jobs?

Voters in ten states will be weighing in on matters of life and death this coming November as efforts to codify a “right” to abortion are included on ballots.

Since the fall of Roe in June of 2022, pro-lifers have been facing strong headwinds, losing six straight state constitutional contests (California, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan, Vermont, and Ohio). Shockingly, many people previously believed to be pro-life have voted for the anti-life initiatives.

What gives?

Clearly there aren’t as many convictional life advocates as survey data once suggested. But there is also indication that some of these same people are buying into a number of lies regularly promoted in these sham campaigns.

Chief among them is the claim that women die when abortion is banned. Not only is there no evidence to back up such an outrageous statement, but it belies the fact that someone does die in every abortion – the baby.

There are no laws on the books in America that prevent or prohibit lifesaving care for women who may have suffered an ectopic pregnancy or some other serious condition.

Fearmongering and gaslighting are effective tools of abortion radicals, though, and so when uninformed voters are faced with a vote, too many have swallowed hook, line and sinker the lies they’ve been told.

Election results on abortion would be different if voters were faced with these questions instead of generic language:

Should Sonya Curry have been permitted to kill her son, NBA great Steph Curry?

Should Pattie Mallette have been permitted to kill her son, popstar Justin Bieber?

Should Joanne Schieble have been permitted to kill her son, Apple founder Steve Jobs?

It’s different when names are attached to issues.

Back when Sonya was pregnant with Steph, she went so far as to drive herself to a Planned Parenthood clinic. The regret and guilt of a previous abortion prevented her from going inside.

Pattie Mallete conceived Justin when she was just 17. Faced with the daunting undertaking of being an unmarried teenage mother, she was encouraged to abort him. She rejected the horrible advice.

Joanne Schieble was 23 and single when she conceived Steve. She was in the prime modern-day demographic to abort. But abortion was illegal back in 1955, so she made an adoption plan and Steve was given an opportunity to grow up in Silicon Valley surrounded by everything he needed to become the professional genius that changed the way the world communicates.

When citizens vote to codify abortion in state constitutions, they’re voting to kill people like Steph Curry, Justin Bieber, and Steve Jobs. They’re voting against future athletic greatness, against future musical performances, against paradigm-shifting technological advances.

Abortion stifles innovation, blocks cures for diseases, and robs us of siblings, spouses, friends, colleagues and presidents. It’s the literal manifestation of the words of the poet John Greenleaf Whittier:

For of all sad words of tongue or pen, the saddest are these: ‘It might have been!’

Those who vote to enshrine a constitutional “right” to abortion may think they’re being compassionate and thoughtful, even expanding personal freedoms for women and men. They’re doing the exact opposite, enslaving the mother and father to a lifetime of pain and regret, not to mention depriving the world of millions of new lives made in God’s image. They’re believing one more lie in a list of many.

Steve Jobs, Steph Curry, and Justin Bieber aren’t officially on any ballots this year, but the right to kill people like them is – and voters need to face that cold, hard reality, and choose life.

Photo From Shutterstock.